S&P affirms credit ratings of Development Bank of Kazakhstan at "BBB/A-2", outlook negative
15.07.15 11:53
/Standard & Poor's, London, July 10, 15, KASE heading/ Standard & Poor's
Ratings Services affirmed its 'BBB/A-2' long- and short-term foreign and local
currency issuer credit ratings on the Development Bank of Kazakhstan. The
outlook is negative.
We also affirmed the Kazakhstan national scale rating on DBK at 'kzAA+'.
The affirmation reflects our view that there is an almost certain likelihood
that the government of Kazakhstan would provide timely and extraordinary
support to the institution in a financial stress scenario. DBK is the largest
subsidiary of the National Management Holding Baiterek and we expect it to
remain core to the overall Baiterek Group's strategy, which is broadly aimed at
supporting Kazakhstan's economic development and diversification. These
strengths are moderated by DBK's relatively weak stand-alone credit profile
(SACP) of 'b+', primarily reflecting concentrated wholesale funding, high
industry concentrations in the loan book, and volatile and low core
profitability.
We rate DBK under our criteria, "Group Rating Methodology" and "Rating
Government-Related Entities: Methodology And Assumptions." We equalize the
ratings on DBK with those on Kazakhstan as we believe there is an almost
certain likelihood that the government will provide timely and extraordinary
support to the institution in a potential stress scenario. Our view of the
likelihood of extraordinary government support is based on:
- DBK's integral link with the government of Kazakhstan, which fully owns
DBK through National Management Holding Baiterek. DBK was
established in 2001 by a Presidential Decree, and it has special public
status as a national development institution under the Law On
Development Bank of Kazakhstan. DBK does not have a banking license
and is not required to comply with prudential regulations applicable to
commercial banks.
- DBK's critical role as the pr economy
through commercial banks, in line with the provisions of DBK's strategy for
2014- 2023.
Our 'b+' SACP for DBK reflects the anchor of 'bb-' for a financial institution
operating in Kazakhstan, as well as its adequate business position, strong
capital and earnings, moderate risk position, below average funding, and strong
liquidity, as our criteria define these terms.
Our assessment of DBK's business position as adequate balances its public-
policy role as a specialized development institution with the aim of financing
infrastructure and industrial projects in the private and public sectors, and
its significant size, against the government-directed nature of its lending,
which impedes its business stability. DBK is National Management Holding
Baiterek's largest subsidiary and accounted for 60% of Baiterek Group's
consolidated assets at year-end 2014. That said, DBK had assets of KZT1.4
trillion ($7.6 billion) as of March 31, 2015, making it somewhat smaller than
the largest two commercial banks--Kazkommertsbank JSC (KKB) and Halyk Savings
Bank of Kazakhstan (Halyk), both of which have assets of more than KZT2.6
trillion. In 2014, the majority of the bank's management board was replaced, so
the track record of the new board is nascent.
Our assessment of DBK's capital and earnings as strong reflects our expectation
of continued regular and sizable capital injections from the government to
support the bank's growth. We forecast that our risk-adjusted capital (RAC)
ratio could weaken, but stay above 10% in the next 12-18 months due to expected
moderating loan growth. It was 14.8% at year-end 2014. The amount and timing
of the shareholder capital injections and credit growth greatly influence our
RAC ratio. If the bank's future growth rates and its capital policy and
philosophy started to improve or worsen materially from our current
expectations, we would likely reconsider our RAC projection and capital
assessment.
As a state development bank, DBK's business strategy is policy focused rather
than profit-driven. Nevertheless, the bank seeks to ensure a return sufficient
to cover its operating and borrowing costs. DBK's income has been volatile and
core profitability low over the past five years, and we expect it to remain so.
Our moderate assessment of DBK's risk position mainly reflects a weaker loss
experience than Kazakh commercial banks that have not been restructured, a
very high share of loans in foreign currencies, and high industry
concentrations. Because it transferred most of its nonperforming loans (NPLs)
to Investment Fund of Kazakhstan, another subsidiary of National Management
Holding Baiterek, in late 2013 and in 2014, NPLs reduced to 4.7% at year-end
2014 (including NPLs on leases) from 41% at year-end 2012. Restructured loans
were an additional 2.2% on March 31, 2015. NPLs were covered by provisionsby
107% at year-end 2014.
In our opinion, DBK's funding is below average, reflecting high refinancing risk
due to its concentrated wholesale funding profile. Of loans from financial
institutions, about 95% was accounted for by Export-Import Bank of China and
China Development Bank. Debt securities are dominated by Eurobonds. We
assess liquidity as strong, reflecting significant holdings of liquid assets and
moderate wholesale debt repayments of KZT82 billion in 2015, including
Eurobonds of $277 million (KZT51 billion) maturing in December 2015. We
expect them to be replaced by loans from China Development Bank. We
anticipate that the bank's liquidity would gradually decline to adequate levels
in line with its strategy to increase percentage of loans on its balance
sheet.
The negative outlook on DBK mirrors our outlook on the sovereign ratings on
Kazakhstan. We would likely revise the outlook or raise or lower the ratings on
DBK if we took similar rating actions on the sovereign.
We consider that the likelihood that we could lower the rating independently
from the sovereign rating is low. This could, however, be the case if we no
longer assessed extraordinary government support as almost certain--for
example, if we consider that policy changes had weakened the bank's role, or if
we saw signs of weakening government support.
Analytical Group Contact:
International Public Finance Ratings Europe;
PublicFinanceEurope@standardandpoors.com
[2015-07-15]